Expectations versus reality: experiences, perceptions and student performance in relation to remote teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.5.2021.2431Keywords:
remote teaching, quantitative analysis, Wilcoxon test, academic performance, Higher EducationAbstract
This research seeks to identify two macro-constructs: perceived self-efficacy (at the beginning and end of the first remote semester) and expectations (expected at the beginning of the semester and those observed at the end of the same semester). To this purpose, 135 students participated in both stages of data collection in a Brazilian public institution of higher education, based on the observation of means and medians and using the Wilcoxon test for paired groups. Freshman and veteran students were different in terms of academic performance. In addition, the time spent on the Internet by students for academics activities was different before and after the remote experience, but for non-academics was not. The expectations indicators show bigger differences than the self-efficacy indicators throughout the semester. Still, the time of internet use for non-academics activities did not change, but for academics there was change. Also, veteran students have more satisfactory overall results than freshmen, what reinforces the need for greater institutional attention to this follow-up.
Downloads
References
AGUILERA-HERMIDA, Patricia. College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, [s. l.], v. 1, p. 100011, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
ARRUDA, Euclidio. Educação Remota Emergencial: elementos para políticas públicas na educação brasileira em tempos de Covid-19. Revista de Educação a distância Em Rede, v.7, n.1, p.257-275, 2020.
BANDURA, Albert. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: PAJARES, Frank; URDAN, Timothy C. (org.). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, Conn: IAP - Information Age Pub., Inc, 2006. (Adolescence and education). p. 307-337.
BATES, Reid; KHASAWNEH, Samer. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 1, p. 175–191, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n? 188, de 03 de fevereiro de 2020. Declara Emergência em Saúde Pública de importância Nacional (ESPIN) em decorrência da Infecção Humana pelo novo Coronavírus (2019-nCoV). Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, edição 24-A, Brasília, DF, p.1, 04 fev. 2020.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Portaria n? 343, de 17 de março de 2020. Dispõe sobre a substituição das aulas presenciais por aulas em meios digitais enquanto durar a situação da pandemia do Novo Coranavírus – COVID-19. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, edição 53, Brasilía, DF, p.39, 18 mar.2020.
CRONBACH, Lee. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, v. 16. n. 3, p. 297-334, set. 1951.
INGOLD, Tim. The perception of the environment: essays of livelihood, dwelling and skill. Londres/Nova York: Routledge, 2000.
JOSSO, Mari-Christine. Experiências de vida e formação. Lisboa: Educa, 2002.
KNUDSON, Duane. A tale of two instructional experiences: student engagement in active learning and emergency remote learning of biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, [s. l.], p. 1–11, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1810306. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
LAWSON, Michael J. et al. Teachers’ and Students’ Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning. Educational Psychology Review, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 223–251, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
LEVIN, Jack; FOX, James; FORDE, David. Estatística para Ciências Humanas. 11. ed. São Paulo: Pearson, 2012.
MAYDIANTORO, Albet et al. (Emergency) Online Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 Crisis: Students’ Perception of the Situation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 12, p. 6445–6463, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081210. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
MORENO, Luisa Zanolli; MORCILLO, André Moreno. Comparação de dois grupos pareados Teste de Wilcoxon. [s. l.], 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35331.66081. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
NEVES, Vanusa; VALDEGIL, Daniel; SABINO, Raquel. Ensino remoto emergencial durante a pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil: estado da arte. Práticas Educativas, Memórias e Oralidades - Rev. Pemo, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. e325271, 2021. DOI: 10.47149/pemo.v3i2.5271. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revpemo/article/view/5271. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
PARDO KUKLINSKI, Hugo; COBO, Cristobál. Expandir la universidad más allá de la enseñanza remota de emergencia: ideas hacia un modelo híbrido post-pandemia. Barcelona: Outliers School, 2020.
RAUEN, Fábio. Roteiros de pesquisa. Rio do Sul: Nova Era, 2006.
R CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Version 4.0), 2021. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/. Acesso em: 08 jun. 2021.
SOUZA, Ana Cláudia; ALEXANDRE, Neusa Maria Costa; GUIRARDELLO, Edinêis de Brito. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde, Brasília, v. 26, n.3, p.647-657, jul-set. 2017. DOI: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
TINTO, Vincent. Completing college: rethinking institutional action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. 240 p.
THE JAMOVI PROJECT. Jamovi. (Version 1.8), 2021. [Computer Software]. Disponível em: https://www.jamovi.org. Acesso em: 08 jun. 2021.
VAUGHAN, Norman; CLEVELAND-INNES, Martha; GARRISON, Randy. Teaching in blended learning environments: creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Edmonton: AU Press, 2013. (Issues in distance education series).
VADAKALU ELUMALAI, Kesavan et al. Factors Affecting the Quality of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Higher Education Students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 731–753, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.28945/4628. Acesso em: 9 jun. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Valesca Brasil Irala, Leandro Blass, Maria Regina de Oliveira Casartelli , Cristiano Saldanha da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBILITY: I hereby certify that I partially or fully participated in the conception of the work, that I did not hide any links or financial agreements between the authors and companies that may be interested in this article publication. I certify that the text is original and that the work, partially or fully, or any other work with a substantially similar content written by me, was not sent to any other journal and it will not be send while my submission is being considered by Revista Educar Mais, whether in printed or electronic format.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the manuscript and, when sending the article to the journal, guarantees s/he has obtained the permission to do so, as well as s/he guarantees the article does not infringe upon anyone’s copyright nor violate any proprietary rights. The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed.
Revista Educar Mais is Open Access, does not charge any fees, whether for submission or article processing. The journal adopts Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI)’s definition, i.e., any users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search and link to the full texts of these articles.
All the articles are published under the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional license. The authors keep the copyright of their production. That way, they must be contacted directly if there is any interest in commercial use of their work.