Cultural-historical didactics and education theory

Authors

  • Hartmut Giest University of Potsdam (Faculty of Human Sciences - Department of Teacher Training - Professor for Primary Education/General Studies) Potsdam – Germany http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-6954

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.4.2020.237-260.1784

Keywords:

Cultural-historical didactics, Education theory, L. S. Vygotskij.

Abstract

Cultural-historical didactics is explained as psychologically based didactics and presented in its essential characteristics, starting from its theoretical grounding. This approach and the relations thereby produced in comparison to educational‐theoretical didactics of Wolfgang Klafki are discussed as a contribution most useful to solve current problems of the classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AEBLI, H. Psychologische Didaktik: Didaktische Auswertung der Psychologie von Jean Piaget. Stuttgart: Klett, 1970.

_____. Grundlagen des Lehrens. Eine Allgemeine Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Stuttgart: Klett, 1987.

_____. Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens. Stuttgart: Klett, 1983.

AUSUBEL, D. P. The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 1960, pp. 267-272.

BILLETT, S. Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorizing. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1996, pp. 263-280.

BRANSFORD, J. D.; SHERWOOD, R. D.; HASSELBRING, T. S.; KINZER, C. K. & WILLIAMS, S. M. Anchored Instructions: Why we need it and how technology can help. In: NIX, Don; Spiro, Rand (Eds.): Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, pp 115-141. Hillsdale, N.J., 1990.

COGNITION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP AT VANDERBILT. Anchored Instructions and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 1990, pp 2-10.

COLLINS, A.; BROWN, J.S. & NEWMAN, S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: RESNICK, L. B. (Ed.). Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, N.J., 1990, pp. 453-494.

DAVYDOV, V. V. What is real learning activity? In HEDEGAARD, M. & LOMPSCHER, J. (Eds.). Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1999, pp. 123-138.

DAWYDOV, V. V. Arten der Verallgemeinerung im Unterricht. Berlin: Volk und Wissen, 1977.

DE JONG, D.T. Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In ELEN, J.; CLARK, R.E. Handling Complexitiy in Learning Environments. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Theory and Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 107-128.

EIGLER, G. & STRAKA, G. A. Mastery learning. Lernerfolg für jeden? München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1978.

EILKS, I. Von der Rastertunnelmikroskopie zur Struktur des Wassermoleküls – Ein anderer Weg durch das Teilchenkonzept in der Sekundarstufe I (Teil 1). Chemie und Schule, 4, 17, 2002, pp. 7-12.

EINSIEDLER, W. (Ed.) Unterrichtentwicklung und Didaktische Entwicklungsforschung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2011.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. The Future of Activity Theory: a Rough Draft. Keynote lecture presented at the ISCAR Conference in San Diego, Sept. 8-13, 2008. URL: http://lchc.ucsd.edu/ mca/Paper/ISCARkeyEngestrom.pdf.

_____. The Future of Activity Theory: a Rough Draft. In SANNINO, A., DANIELS, H. & GUTIÉRREZ, K.D. (Eds.). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: University Press, 2009, pp. 303-328.

FEUERSTEIN, R., FEUERSTEIN, R. S., FALIK, L. H. & RAND, Y. Creating and enhancing cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Publications, 2006.

GAL’PERIN, P. YA. Stages in the development of mental acts // A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology. Eds. M. COLE, I. MALTZMAN. New York: Basic Books, 1969, pp. 249-273.

GAL’PERIN, P. J. Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30, 4, 1992, pp. 60-80.

GAL’PERIN, P. J. Mental Actions as a Basis for the Formation of Thoughts and Images. Soviet Psychology, 27, 3, 2014, pp. 45-64.

GEISSLER, H. G. & PUFFE, M. Part 2: Experiments on discrete feature processing. In: GEISSLER, E. A. (Ed.): Modern Issues in Perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 106-124.

GENTNER, D., LOEWENSTEIN, J. & THOMPSON, L. Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 2, 2003, pp. 393-408.

GIEST, H. Sachunterrichtsplanung als Planung des Lernprozesses der Schülerinnen und Schüler. (Planning General Studies as planning of pupils’ learning processes. Well-founded planning of General Instruction). In TÄNZER, S. & LAUTERBACH, R. (Eds.). Sachunterricht begründet planen. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2010, pp. 179-202.

_____. Tätigkeitstheoretische bzw. kulturhistorisch orientierte Didaktik. Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2013a, pp. 32-42.

_____. Lernwege der Kinder und die Lehrstrategie des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten. In WITTKOWSKE, S. & MALTZAHN, K. V. (Eds.): Lebenswirklichkeit und Sachunterricht. Bad. Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2013b, pp. 25-47.

_____. Promotion of knowledge acquisition and conceptual change in classroom. The strategy ascending from the abstract to the concrete (AC). Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10, 4, 2014, pp. 99-109.

_____. Diagnostik und Inklusion im Sachunterricht. In SCHÄFER, H. & RITTMEYER, C. (Eds.). Handbuch Inklusive Diagnostik. Weinheim: Beltz, 2015, pp. 214-229.

_____. Aufsteigen vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten – Eine Herausforderung für die didaktische Theoriebildung. In MUSENBERG, O. & RIEGERT, J. (Eds.). Didaktik und Differenz. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2016, pp. 111-121.

_____. Tätigkeitstheoretische bzw. kultur?historisch orientierte Didaktik. Tätigkeitstheorie, 14, 2016, pp. 13-23.

_____.Kulturhistorische Didaktik – Zwischen Bildungstheorie und Lernpsychologien. In KÖKER, A. & STÖRTELÄNDER, J. (Eds.): Kritische und konstruktive Anschlüsse an das Werk Wolfgang Klafkis. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz, Juventa, 2017, pp. 104-121.

_____. Vygotsky’s Defectology: A Misleading Term for a Great Conception. Educação, 41, 3, 2018, p. 334-346.

GIEST, H. Cultural-historical didactics and education theory (Bildungstheorie). Tätigkeitstheorie, 14, 2016, 24- 48.

_____. Entwicklungsfaktor Unterricht. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik e.V., 2002.

GIEST, H. & HINTZE, K. Die Lehrstrategie des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten im Sachunterricht. Untersucht am Beispiel eines salutogenen Gesundheitsbegriffs. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 7, 2, 2014, pp. 115-128.

GIEST, H. & LOMPSCHER, J. Lerntätigkeit – Lernen aus kulturhistorischer Perspektive. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung einer neuen Lernkultur im Unterricht. Berlin: Lehmann, 2006.

GIEST, H. & LOMPSCHER, J. Lehrstrategien. In ROST, D. H., SPARFELDT, J. R. & BUCH, S. R. (Eds.). Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie. 5. Eds. Weinheim: Beltz, 2017, pp. 408-416.

GIEST, H. & WALGENBACH, W. System-learning – a new challenge to education – bridging special field to transdisciplinary learning. In: ZELTSERMAN, B. (Ed.): Obrazovanije 21 veka: dostizhenija i perspektivij. Mezhdunarodnij sbornik teoreticheskikh, metodicheskikh i prakticheskikh rabot po problemam obrazovanija (Education in the 21st century: Results and Perspectives. International anthology of theoretical, didactical and practical work on problems of education). Riga: Experiment, 2002, pp. 21-37.

GRYGIER, P., GÜNTHER, J. & KIRCHER, E. (Eds.). Über Naturwissenschaften lernen. Vermittlung von Wissenschaftsverständnis in der Grundschule. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2007.

HALLDÉN, O. Conceptual change and contextualization. In W. SCHNOTZ, ST. VOSNIADOU & M. CARRETERO (EDS.). New Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Amsterdam...: Pergamon, 1999, pp. 53-65.

HEDEGAARD, M. (Ed.). Learning in Classrooms – A Cultural-Historical Approach. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2001.

HEDEGAARD, M. & LOMPSCHER, J. Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1999.

HINTZE, K. & GIEST, H. (2014): Promotion of scientific concept formation and acquisition in classroom — shown at the example of health concept. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10, 4, 2014, pp. 110-120.

HOGAN, K. & PRESSLEY, M. Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In HOGAN, K. & PRESSLEY, M. (Eds.). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge: Brookline Books, 1997, pp. 74-107.

HOFFMANN, J. A Simulation Approach to Conceptual Identification. In KURCZ, I., SHUGAR, G. W. & DANKS, J. H. Knowledge and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986, pp. 49-68.

HOLZKAMP, K. Lehren als Lernbehinderung? Forum Kritische Psychologie, 27, 1991, pp. 5-22.

ILJENKOW, E. V. Die Dialektik des Abstrakten und Konkreten im „Kapital“ von Karl Marx. [Übers. aus d. Russ. ins Dt.: L. Gurwitsch]. Berlin: deb, 1979.

JANTZEN, W. Schriften zur kulturhistorischen Psychologie. Tätigkeitstheorie, H. 11, 2014. URL: http://www.ich-sciences.de/index.php?id=144&L=0 [02.10.2015].

KERRES, M. Mediendidaktik. In Gross, F. von, Hugger, K.-U. & Sander, U. (Eds.): Handbuch Medienpädagogik, 1-6.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007.

KIRSCHNER, P. A., SWELLER, J. & CLARK, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, 2006, pp. 75-86.

KLAFKI, W. Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Weinheim: Beltz, 1963.

_____. Das pädagogische Problem des Elementaren und die Theorie der kategorialen Bildung. Weinheim: Beltz, 1964a.

_____. Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung. In ROTH, H. & BLUMENTHAL, A. (Eds.): Didaktische Analyse. Auswahl grundlegender Aufsätze aus der Zeitschrift ‚Die Deutsche Schule‘. Hannover: Schrödel, 1964b, pp. 5-34.

_____. Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27, 1, 1995, pp. 13-30.

_____. Didactic analysis as the core preparation of instruction. In WESTBURY, I., HOPMANN, S. & RIQUARTS, K. (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000, pp. 139-159.

_____. Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Weinheim: Beltz, 1985/1993/2007.

_____. Characteristics of critical-constructive didactics. In GUNDEM, B. B. & HOPMANN, S. (Eds.). Didactics and/or curriculum. An international dialogue. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1998, pp. 307-330.

_____. The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In WESTBURY, I., HOPMANN, S. & RIQUARTS, K. (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000, pp. 85-107.

KLAUER K.J. Situiertes Lernen. In ROST, D. (Ed.). Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie Weinheim: Beltz, 2001. pp. 635-641.

KLAUSER, F. Problem-based Learning. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 1, 2, 1998, pp. 273-293.

KLINGBERG, L. Lernen – Lehren – Unterricht. Über den Eigensinn der Didaktischen. Lern-Lehr-Forschung. LLF-Berichte, Nr.17. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam, 1997.

KOLLAR, I. & FISCHER, F. Was ist eigentlich aus der neuen Lernkultur geworden? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 1, 2008, pp. 49-62.

KOLODNER, J.-U., CAMP, P.J., CRISMOND, D., FASSE, B., GRAY, J., HOLBROOK, J., PUNTAMBEKAR, S. & RYAN, M. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 4, 2003, pp. 495-547.

KOZULIN, A., GINDIS, B., AGEYEV, V. S. & MILLER, S. M. Vygotsky's Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

KUHN, T. S. (2012): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (4th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

LAVE J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

LAVE J. & WENGER E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

LOHRMANN, K. (Un)ähnlichkeit zwischen naturwissenschaftlichen Phänomenen aus der Sicht von Grundschulkindern. Interviewstudien zum Structural Alignment. Empirische Pädagogik, 24, 3, 2010a, pp. 264-285.

_____. Hebel. In HAIDER, M. & HARTINGER, A. (Eds.). Experimentieren im Sachunterricht. Berlin: Cornelsen, 2010b, pp. 26-29).

LOMPSCHER, J. Learning activity and its formation: Ascending from the abstract to the concrete. In: Hedegaard, M. & Lompscher, J. Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press1, 1999, pp. 39-166.

_____. Tätigkeit – Lerntätigkeit – Lehrstrategie. Die Theorie der Lerntätigkeit und ihre empirische Erforschung. Redaktionell bearbeitet und herausgegeben von HARTMUT GIEST UND GEORG RÜCKRIEM. Berlin: Lehmann, 2006.

_____. The category of activity – a principal constituent of cultural-historical psychology. In ROBBINS, D. & STETSENKO, A. (Eds.). Vygotsky’s psychology: Voices from the post and present. New York: Nova Science Press, 2002.

_____. Was ist und was will Psychologische Didaktik? In: Lern- und Lehrforschung, LLF-Berichte, Nr. 7, 1994, pp. 5-26.

MARX, K. Einleitung zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In MARX, K. & ENGELS, F. Werke, vol. 13, Berlin: Dietz Verlag. 1971, pp. 3-160. (See also MARX, K. Preface and Introduction to A Contribution To The Critique Of Political Economy. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1976 and MARX, K. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1993.

MEYER, M. A, & RAKHKOCHKINE, A. Wolfgang Klafki’s concept of ‘Didaktik’ and its reception in Russia. European Educational Research Journal, 17, 1, 2018, 17-36. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117718757

MIKELSKIS-SEIFERT, S. Lernen über Modelle: Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Konzeption für die Einführung des Teilchenmodells. In FISCHLER, H. & REINERS, C. S. (Eds.). Die Teilchenstruktur der Materie im Physik- und Chemieunterricht. Berlin: Logos, 2006, pp. 165-198.

MIKELSKIS-SEIFERT, S. & LEISNER, A. Das Denken in Modellen fördern. Ein Unterrichtsbeispiel zur Entwicklung von Teilchenvorstellungen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht, Physik, 71, 2003, pp. 32-34.

MILLHOFFER, P. Der ‘Inquiry Approach‘ – übergreifendes curriculares Prinzip in den USA und Kanada. In KAISER, A. & PECH, D. (Eds.). Basiswissen Sachunterricht. Bd.2. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2004, pp. 195-204.

MÖLLER, K., HARDY, I., JONEN, A., KLEICKMANN, T. & BLUMBERG, E. Naturwissenschaften in der Primarstufe – Zur Förderung konzeptuellen Verständnisses durch Unterricht und zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfortbildungen. In PRENZEL, M. & ALLOLIO-NÄCKE, L. (Eds.). Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms BiQua. Münster: Waxmann, 2006, pp. 161-193.

NERSESSIAN, N. L. Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change. In VOSNIADOU, S. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York, London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 391-416.

OSER, F. & BAERISWYL, F. (2001): Choreographies of Teaching: Bridging Instruction to Learning. In: Richardson, Virginia (Ed.): Handbook of research on teaching. New York: American Educational Research Association, 2001, pp. 1031-1065.

OSER, F. & SARASIN, S. Basismodelle des Unterrichts: Von der Sequenzierung als Lernerleichterung. Lern- und Lehrforschung, LLF-Berichte, Nr. 11. Potsdam, 1995, pp. 82-107.

OERS, B. V., WARDEKKER, W., ELBERS, E. & VEER, R.V.D. The Transformation of Learning. Cambridge a.o.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

PALINCSAR, A. S. & BROWN, A. L. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension – Fostering and Comprehension – Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 2, 1984, pp. 117-175.

POL, J. VAN DE, VOLMAN, M. & BEISHUIZEN, J. (2010): Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 2010, pp. 271-296. DOI 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.

REISER, B. Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13, 3, 2004, pp. 273-304.

ROGOFF, B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1900.

SCHÄNK, R. C., PANO, A., BELL, B. & JONA, M. The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences ? 3(4), 1993/1994, pp. 305-345.

SCHLIEMANN, A. D. Logic of Meanings and situated Cognition. Learning and Instruction, 9, 1998, pp. 549-560.

SMITH, E., GONON, P. & FOLEY, A. (Eds.) Architectures of Apprenticeship. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2015.

SODIAN, B., JONEN, A., THOERMER, C. & KIRCHER, E. Die Natur der Naturwissenschaften verstehen. Implementierung wissenschaftstheoretischen Unterrichts in der Grundschule. In PRENZEL, M. & ALLOLIO-NÄCKE, L. (Eds.): Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprograms. Münster: Waxmann, 2006, pp. 147-160.

SODIAN, B., KOERBER, S. & THOERMER, C. (2006): Zur Entwicklung des naturwissenschaftlichen Denkens im Vor- und Grundschulalter. In NENTWIG, P. & SCHANZE, S. (Eds.). Es ist nie zu früh! Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in frühen Jahren. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 11-20.

STAUB, F. C. (2006): Allgemeine Didaktik und Lernpsychologie: Zur Dynamisierung eines schwierigen Verhältnisses. In BAER, M., FUCHS, M., FÜGLISTER, P., REUSSER, K. & WYSS, H. (Eds.): Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Bern: hep, pp. 169-179.

STEINER G. Lernen und Wissenserwerb. In KRAPP, A. & WEIDENMANN, B. (EDS.). Pädagogische Psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz, 2006, pp. 163-202.

VOSNIADOU, S. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York, London: Routledge, 2008.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Denken und Sprechen. Weinheim: Beltz, 2002. (See also VYGOTSKY, LEV S. Thought and Language: Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 1986.

_____. History of higher psychic functions. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4. Berlin: Springer, 1987a.

_____. Die Krise der Psychologie in ihrer historischen Bedeutung. In VYGOTSKY, L. S. Ausgewählte Schriften, Bd. 1. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein, 1985, pp. 57-278. See also L.S. VYGOTSKIJ. Die Krise der Psychologie in ihrer historischen Bedeutung. In LEV VYGOTSKIJ. Ausgewählte Schriften. Vol. I. Berlin: Lehmanns Media, 2003, 57-278.

_____. The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. In The Collected Works of Vygotsky. New York: Plenum Press, 1987b. (Translated by Rene Van Der Veer).

WALGENBACH, W. Interdisziplinäre Systembildung – Eine Aktualisierung bildungstheoretischer Ansätze. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang, 2000.

WHITE, B.Y., FREDERIKSEN, J.R. Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 1, 1998, pp. 3-118.

WOLF, D. Zur Methode des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten. In: Elbe, Ingo/ Reichardt, Tobias/ Wolf, Dieter: Gesellschaftliche Praxis und ihre wissenschaftliche Darstellung. Beiträge zur Kapital-Diskussion. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft 6, 2008, pp.7-136.

WOOD, D., BRUNER, J. & ROSS, G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 2, 1976, pp. 89-100.

ZUCKERMAN, G. A. Development of reflection through learning activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 2004, pp. 9-18.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-08

How to Cite

Giest, H. (2020). Cultural-historical didactics and education theory. Educar Mais, 4(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.4.2020.237-260.1784

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Educar Mais

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBILITY: I hereby certify that I partially or fully participated in the conception of the work, that I did not hide any links or financial agreements between the authors and companies that may be interested in this article publication. I certify that the text is original and that the work, partially or fully, or any other work with a substantially similar content written by me, was not sent to any other journal and it will not be send while my submission is being considered by Revista Educar Mais, whether in printed or electronic format.

The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the manuscript and, when sending the article to the journal, guarantees s/he has obtained the permission to do so, as well as s/he guarantees the article does not infringe upon anyone’s copyright nor violate any proprietary rights. The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed.

Revista Educar Mais is Open Access, does not charge any fees, whether for submission or article processing. The journal adopts Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI)’s definition, i.e., any users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search and link to the full texts of these articles.

All the articles are published under the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional license. The authors keep the copyright of their production. That way, they must be contacted directly if there is any interest in commercial use of their work.