Didática histórico-cultural e teoria da educação

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.4.2020.237-260.1784

Palavras-chave:

Didática histórico-cultural, Teoria da educação, L. S. Vygotskij.

Resumo

A didática histórico-cultural é explicada como didática com base psicológica e apresentada em suas características essenciais, partindo de sua fundamentação teórica. Essa abordagem e as relações assim produzidas em comparação com a didática teórico-educacional de Wolfgang Klafki são discutidas como uma contribuição mais útil para resolver os problemas atuais da sala de aula.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AEBLI, H. Psychologische Didaktik: Didaktische Auswertung der Psychologie von Jean Piaget. Stuttgart: Klett, 1970.

_____. Grundlagen des Lehrens. Eine Allgemeine Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Stuttgart: Klett, 1987.

_____. Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens. Stuttgart: Klett, 1983.

AUSUBEL, D. P. The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 1960, pp. 267-272.

BILLETT, S. Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorizing. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1996, pp. 263-280.

BRANSFORD, J. D.; SHERWOOD, R. D.; HASSELBRING, T. S.; KINZER, C. K. & WILLIAMS, S. M. Anchored Instructions: Why we need it and how technology can help. In: NIX, Don; Spiro, Rand (Eds.): Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, pp 115-141. Hillsdale, N.J., 1990.

COGNITION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP AT VANDERBILT. Anchored Instructions and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 1990, pp 2-10.

COLLINS, A.; BROWN, J.S. & NEWMAN, S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: RESNICK, L. B. (Ed.). Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, N.J., 1990, pp. 453-494.

DAVYDOV, V. V. What is real learning activity? In HEDEGAARD, M. & LOMPSCHER, J. (Eds.). Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1999, pp. 123-138.

DAWYDOV, V. V. Arten der Verallgemeinerung im Unterricht. Berlin: Volk und Wissen, 1977.

DE JONG, D.T. Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In ELEN, J.; CLARK, R.E. Handling Complexitiy in Learning Environments. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Theory and Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 107-128.

EIGLER, G. & STRAKA, G. A. Mastery learning. Lernerfolg für jeden? München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1978.

EILKS, I. Von der Rastertunnelmikroskopie zur Struktur des Wassermoleküls – Ein anderer Weg durch das Teilchenkonzept in der Sekundarstufe I (Teil 1). Chemie und Schule, 4, 17, 2002, pp. 7-12.

EINSIEDLER, W. (Ed.) Unterrichtentwicklung und Didaktische Entwicklungsforschung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2011.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. The Future of Activity Theory: a Rough Draft. Keynote lecture presented at the ISCAR Conference in San Diego, Sept. 8-13, 2008. URL: http://lchc.ucsd.edu/ mca/Paper/ISCARkeyEngestrom.pdf.

_____. The Future of Activity Theory: a Rough Draft. In SANNINO, A., DANIELS, H. & GUTIÉRREZ, K.D. (Eds.). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: University Press, 2009, pp. 303-328.

FEUERSTEIN, R., FEUERSTEIN, R. S., FALIK, L. H. & RAND, Y. Creating and enhancing cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Publications, 2006.

GAL’PERIN, P. YA. Stages in the development of mental acts // A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology. Eds. M. COLE, I. MALTZMAN. New York: Basic Books, 1969, pp. 249-273.

GAL’PERIN, P. J. Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30, 4, 1992, pp. 60-80.

GAL’PERIN, P. J. Mental Actions as a Basis for the Formation of Thoughts and Images. Soviet Psychology, 27, 3, 2014, pp. 45-64.

GEISSLER, H. G. & PUFFE, M. Part 2: Experiments on discrete feature processing. In: GEISSLER, E. A. (Ed.): Modern Issues in Perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 106-124.

GENTNER, D., LOEWENSTEIN, J. & THOMPSON, L. Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 2, 2003, pp. 393-408.

GIEST, H. Sachunterrichtsplanung als Planung des Lernprozesses der Schülerinnen und Schüler. (Planning General Studies as planning of pupils’ learning processes. Well-founded planning of General Instruction). In TÄNZER, S. & LAUTERBACH, R. (Eds.). Sachunterricht begründet planen. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2010, pp. 179-202.

_____. Tätigkeitstheoretische bzw. kulturhistorisch orientierte Didaktik. Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2013a, pp. 32-42.

_____. Lernwege der Kinder und die Lehrstrategie des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten. In WITTKOWSKE, S. & MALTZAHN, K. V. (Eds.): Lebenswirklichkeit und Sachunterricht. Bad. Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2013b, pp. 25-47.

_____. Promotion of knowledge acquisition and conceptual change in classroom. The strategy ascending from the abstract to the concrete (AC). Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10, 4, 2014, pp. 99-109.

_____. Diagnostik und Inklusion im Sachunterricht. In SCHÄFER, H. & RITTMEYER, C. (Eds.). Handbuch Inklusive Diagnostik. Weinheim: Beltz, 2015, pp. 214-229.

_____. Aufsteigen vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten – Eine Herausforderung für die didaktische Theoriebildung. In MUSENBERG, O. & RIEGERT, J. (Eds.). Didaktik und Differenz. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2016, pp. 111-121.

_____. Tätigkeitstheoretische bzw. kultur?historisch orientierte Didaktik. Tätigkeitstheorie, 14, 2016, pp. 13-23.

_____.Kulturhistorische Didaktik – Zwischen Bildungstheorie und Lernpsychologien. In KÖKER, A. & STÖRTELÄNDER, J. (Eds.): Kritische und konstruktive Anschlüsse an das Werk Wolfgang Klafkis. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz, Juventa, 2017, pp. 104-121.

_____. Vygotsky’s Defectology: A Misleading Term for a Great Conception. Educação, 41, 3, 2018, p. 334-346.

GIEST, H. Cultural-historical didactics and education theory (Bildungstheorie). Tätigkeitstheorie, 14, 2016, 24- 48.

_____. Entwicklungsfaktor Unterricht. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik e.V., 2002.

GIEST, H. & HINTZE, K. Die Lehrstrategie des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten im Sachunterricht. Untersucht am Beispiel eines salutogenen Gesundheitsbegriffs. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 7, 2, 2014, pp. 115-128.

GIEST, H. & LOMPSCHER, J. Lerntätigkeit – Lernen aus kulturhistorischer Perspektive. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung einer neuen Lernkultur im Unterricht. Berlin: Lehmann, 2006.

GIEST, H. & LOMPSCHER, J. Lehrstrategien. In ROST, D. H., SPARFELDT, J. R. & BUCH, S. R. (Eds.). Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie. 5. Eds. Weinheim: Beltz, 2017, pp. 408-416.

GIEST, H. & WALGENBACH, W. System-learning – a new challenge to education – bridging special field to transdisciplinary learning. In: ZELTSERMAN, B. (Ed.): Obrazovanije 21 veka: dostizhenija i perspektivij. Mezhdunarodnij sbornik teoreticheskikh, metodicheskikh i prakticheskikh rabot po problemam obrazovanija (Education in the 21st century: Results and Perspectives. International anthology of theoretical, didactical and practical work on problems of education). Riga: Experiment, 2002, pp. 21-37.

GRYGIER, P., GÜNTHER, J. & KIRCHER, E. (Eds.). Über Naturwissenschaften lernen. Vermittlung von Wissenschaftsverständnis in der Grundschule. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2007.

HALLDÉN, O. Conceptual change and contextualization. In W. SCHNOTZ, ST. VOSNIADOU & M. CARRETERO (EDS.). New Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Amsterdam...: Pergamon, 1999, pp. 53-65.

HEDEGAARD, M. (Ed.). Learning in Classrooms – A Cultural-Historical Approach. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2001.

HEDEGAARD, M. & LOMPSCHER, J. Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1999.

HINTZE, K. & GIEST, H. (2014): Promotion of scientific concept formation and acquisition in classroom — shown at the example of health concept. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10, 4, 2014, pp. 110-120.

HOGAN, K. & PRESSLEY, M. Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In HOGAN, K. & PRESSLEY, M. (Eds.). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge: Brookline Books, 1997, pp. 74-107.

HOFFMANN, J. A Simulation Approach to Conceptual Identification. In KURCZ, I., SHUGAR, G. W. & DANKS, J. H. Knowledge and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986, pp. 49-68.

HOLZKAMP, K. Lehren als Lernbehinderung? Forum Kritische Psychologie, 27, 1991, pp. 5-22.

ILJENKOW, E. V. Die Dialektik des Abstrakten und Konkreten im „Kapital“ von Karl Marx. [Übers. aus d. Russ. ins Dt.: L. Gurwitsch]. Berlin: deb, 1979.

JANTZEN, W. Schriften zur kulturhistorischen Psychologie. Tätigkeitstheorie, H. 11, 2014. URL: http://www.ich-sciences.de/index.php?id=144&L=0 [02.10.2015].

KERRES, M. Mediendidaktik. In Gross, F. von, Hugger, K.-U. & Sander, U. (Eds.): Handbuch Medienpädagogik, 1-6.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007.

KIRSCHNER, P. A., SWELLER, J. & CLARK, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, 2006, pp. 75-86.

KLAFKI, W. Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Weinheim: Beltz, 1963.

_____. Das pädagogische Problem des Elementaren und die Theorie der kategorialen Bildung. Weinheim: Beltz, 1964a.

_____. Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung. In ROTH, H. & BLUMENTHAL, A. (Eds.): Didaktische Analyse. Auswahl grundlegender Aufsätze aus der Zeitschrift ‚Die Deutsche Schule‘. Hannover: Schrödel, 1964b, pp. 5-34.

_____. Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27, 1, 1995, pp. 13-30.

_____. Didactic analysis as the core preparation of instruction. In WESTBURY, I., HOPMANN, S. & RIQUARTS, K. (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000, pp. 139-159.

_____. Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Weinheim: Beltz, 1985/1993/2007.

_____. Characteristics of critical-constructive didactics. In GUNDEM, B. B. & HOPMANN, S. (Eds.). Didactics and/or curriculum. An international dialogue. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1998, pp. 307-330.

_____. The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In WESTBURY, I., HOPMANN, S. & RIQUARTS, K. (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000, pp. 85-107.

KLAUER K.J. Situiertes Lernen. In ROST, D. (Ed.). Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie Weinheim: Beltz, 2001. pp. 635-641.

KLAUSER, F. Problem-based Learning. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 1, 2, 1998, pp. 273-293.

KLINGBERG, L. Lernen – Lehren – Unterricht. Über den Eigensinn der Didaktischen. Lern-Lehr-Forschung. LLF-Berichte, Nr.17. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam, 1997.

KOLLAR, I. & FISCHER, F. Was ist eigentlich aus der neuen Lernkultur geworden? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 1, 2008, pp. 49-62.

KOLODNER, J.-U., CAMP, P.J., CRISMOND, D., FASSE, B., GRAY, J., HOLBROOK, J., PUNTAMBEKAR, S. & RYAN, M. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 4, 2003, pp. 495-547.

KOZULIN, A., GINDIS, B., AGEYEV, V. S. & MILLER, S. M. Vygotsky's Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

KUHN, T. S. (2012): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (4th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

LAVE J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

LAVE J. & WENGER E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

LOHRMANN, K. (Un)ähnlichkeit zwischen naturwissenschaftlichen Phänomenen aus der Sicht von Grundschulkindern. Interviewstudien zum Structural Alignment. Empirische Pädagogik, 24, 3, 2010a, pp. 264-285.

_____. Hebel. In HAIDER, M. & HARTINGER, A. (Eds.). Experimentieren im Sachunterricht. Berlin: Cornelsen, 2010b, pp. 26-29).

LOMPSCHER, J. Learning activity and its formation: Ascending from the abstract to the concrete. In: Hedegaard, M. & Lompscher, J. Learning activity and development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press1, 1999, pp. 39-166.

_____. Tätigkeit – Lerntätigkeit – Lehrstrategie. Die Theorie der Lerntätigkeit und ihre empirische Erforschung. Redaktionell bearbeitet und herausgegeben von HARTMUT GIEST UND GEORG RÜCKRIEM. Berlin: Lehmann, 2006.

_____. The category of activity – a principal constituent of cultural-historical psychology. In ROBBINS, D. & STETSENKO, A. (Eds.). Vygotsky’s psychology: Voices from the post and present. New York: Nova Science Press, 2002.

_____. Was ist und was will Psychologische Didaktik? In: Lern- und Lehrforschung, LLF-Berichte, Nr. 7, 1994, pp. 5-26.

MARX, K. Einleitung zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In MARX, K. & ENGELS, F. Werke, vol. 13, Berlin: Dietz Verlag. 1971, pp. 3-160. (See also MARX, K. Preface and Introduction to A Contribution To The Critique Of Political Economy. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1976 and MARX, K. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1993.

MEYER, M. A, & RAKHKOCHKINE, A. Wolfgang Klafki’s concept of ‘Didaktik’ and its reception in Russia. European Educational Research Journal, 17, 1, 2018, 17-36. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117718757

MIKELSKIS-SEIFERT, S. Lernen über Modelle: Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Konzeption für die Einführung des Teilchenmodells. In FISCHLER, H. & REINERS, C. S. (Eds.). Die Teilchenstruktur der Materie im Physik- und Chemieunterricht. Berlin: Logos, 2006, pp. 165-198.

MIKELSKIS-SEIFERT, S. & LEISNER, A. Das Denken in Modellen fördern. Ein Unterrichtsbeispiel zur Entwicklung von Teilchenvorstellungen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht, Physik, 71, 2003, pp. 32-34.

MILLHOFFER, P. Der ‘Inquiry Approach‘ – übergreifendes curriculares Prinzip in den USA und Kanada. In KAISER, A. & PECH, D. (Eds.). Basiswissen Sachunterricht. Bd.2. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider, 2004, pp. 195-204.

MÖLLER, K., HARDY, I., JONEN, A., KLEICKMANN, T. & BLUMBERG, E. Naturwissenschaften in der Primarstufe – Zur Förderung konzeptuellen Verständnisses durch Unterricht und zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfortbildungen. In PRENZEL, M. & ALLOLIO-NÄCKE, L. (Eds.). Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms BiQua. Münster: Waxmann, 2006, pp. 161-193.

NERSESSIAN, N. L. Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change. In VOSNIADOU, S. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York, London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 391-416.

OSER, F. & BAERISWYL, F. (2001): Choreographies of Teaching: Bridging Instruction to Learning. In: Richardson, Virginia (Ed.): Handbook of research on teaching. New York: American Educational Research Association, 2001, pp. 1031-1065.

OSER, F. & SARASIN, S. Basismodelle des Unterrichts: Von der Sequenzierung als Lernerleichterung. Lern- und Lehrforschung, LLF-Berichte, Nr. 11. Potsdam, 1995, pp. 82-107.

OERS, B. V., WARDEKKER, W., ELBERS, E. & VEER, R.V.D. The Transformation of Learning. Cambridge a.o.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

PALINCSAR, A. S. & BROWN, A. L. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension – Fostering and Comprehension – Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 2, 1984, pp. 117-175.

POL, J. VAN DE, VOLMAN, M. & BEISHUIZEN, J. (2010): Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 2010, pp. 271-296. DOI 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.

REISER, B. Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13, 3, 2004, pp. 273-304.

ROGOFF, B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1900.

SCHÄNK, R. C., PANO, A., BELL, B. & JONA, M. The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences ? 3(4), 1993/1994, pp. 305-345.

SCHLIEMANN, A. D. Logic of Meanings and situated Cognition. Learning and Instruction, 9, 1998, pp. 549-560.

SMITH, E., GONON, P. & FOLEY, A. (Eds.) Architectures of Apprenticeship. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2015.

SODIAN, B., JONEN, A., THOERMER, C. & KIRCHER, E. Die Natur der Naturwissenschaften verstehen. Implementierung wissenschaftstheoretischen Unterrichts in der Grundschule. In PRENZEL, M. & ALLOLIO-NÄCKE, L. (Eds.): Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprograms. Münster: Waxmann, 2006, pp. 147-160.

SODIAN, B., KOERBER, S. & THOERMER, C. (2006): Zur Entwicklung des naturwissenschaftlichen Denkens im Vor- und Grundschulalter. In NENTWIG, P. & SCHANZE, S. (Eds.). Es ist nie zu früh! Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in frühen Jahren. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 11-20.

STAUB, F. C. (2006): Allgemeine Didaktik und Lernpsychologie: Zur Dynamisierung eines schwierigen Verhältnisses. In BAER, M., FUCHS, M., FÜGLISTER, P., REUSSER, K. & WYSS, H. (Eds.): Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Bern: hep, pp. 169-179.

STEINER G. Lernen und Wissenserwerb. In KRAPP, A. & WEIDENMANN, B. (EDS.). Pädagogische Psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz, 2006, pp. 163-202.

VOSNIADOU, S. (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York, London: Routledge, 2008.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Denken und Sprechen. Weinheim: Beltz, 2002. (See also VYGOTSKY, LEV S. Thought and Language: Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 1986.

_____. History of higher psychic functions. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4. Berlin: Springer, 1987a.

_____. Die Krise der Psychologie in ihrer historischen Bedeutung. In VYGOTSKY, L. S. Ausgewählte Schriften, Bd. 1. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein, 1985, pp. 57-278. See also L.S. VYGOTSKIJ. Die Krise der Psychologie in ihrer historischen Bedeutung. In LEV VYGOTSKIJ. Ausgewählte Schriften. Vol. I. Berlin: Lehmanns Media, 2003, 57-278.

_____. The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. In The Collected Works of Vygotsky. New York: Plenum Press, 1987b. (Translated by Rene Van Der Veer).

WALGENBACH, W. Interdisziplinäre Systembildung – Eine Aktualisierung bildungstheoretischer Ansätze. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang, 2000.

WHITE, B.Y., FREDERIKSEN, J.R. Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 1, 1998, pp. 3-118.

WOLF, D. Zur Methode des Aufsteigens vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten. In: Elbe, Ingo/ Reichardt, Tobias/ Wolf, Dieter: Gesellschaftliche Praxis und ihre wissenschaftliche Darstellung. Beiträge zur Kapital-Diskussion. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft 6, 2008, pp.7-136.

WOOD, D., BRUNER, J. & ROSS, G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 2, 1976, pp. 89-100.

ZUCKERMAN, G. A. Development of reflection through learning activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 2004, pp. 9-18.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-09-08

Como Citar

Giest, H. (2020). Didática histórico-cultural e teoria da educação. Revista Educar Mais, 4(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.4.2020.237-260.1784

Edição

v. 4 n. 2 (2020)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2020 Hartmut Giest

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

DECLARAÇÃO DE RESPONSABILIDADE: Certifico que participei da concepção do trabalho, em parte ou na íntegra, que não omiti quaisquer ligações ou acordos de financiamento entre os autores e companhias que possam ter interesse na publicação desse artigo. Certifico que o texto é original e que o trabalho, em parte ou na íntegra, ou qualquer outro trabalho com conteúdo substancialmente similar, de minha autoria, não foi enviado a outra revista e não o será enquanto sua publicação estiver sendo considerada pela Revista Educar Mais, quer seja no formato impresso ou no eletrônico.

O autor responsável pela submissão representa todos os autores do trabalho e, ao enviar o artigo para a revista, está garantindo que tem a permissão de todos para fazê-lo. Da mesma forma, assegura que o artigo não viola direitos autorais e que não há plágio no trabalho. A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões emitidas.

A Revista Educar Mais é de acesso aberto (Open Access), sem que haja a necessidade de pagamentos de taxas, seja para submissão ou processamento dos artigos. A revista adota a definição da Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), ou seja, os usuários possuem o direito de ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar e fazer links diretos para os textos completos dos artigos nela publicados.

Todos os artigos são publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Os autores mantém os direitos autorais sobre suas produções, devendo ser contatados diretamente se houver interesse em uso comercial dos trabalhos.