IDEB-2019 results suggest progress in high school

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.5.2021.2582

Keywords:

Ideb, Education, Brazil, Formation

Abstract

Nine states achieved an IDEB greater than or equal to 6 in the early years of elementary school. São Paulo had the best performance, with 6.7 points, followed by the Federal District, Santa Catarina, Paraná and Minas Gerais, with 6.5 points; Ceará, with 6.4 points; Goiás, with 6.2 points; Espírito Santo, with 6.1 points; and Rio Grande do Sul, with 6 points. Pará had the lowest result, with 4.9 points, but surpassed its goal of 4.7 points. In the final years of elementary school, the increase was 0.2 points, with a final result of 4.9 points. Despite the improvement, the index was below the target of 5.2 points in 2019. This teaching stage has 61,800 schools and 11.9 million students in Brazil. The state of São Paulo had the best performance, with 5.5 points, but failed to reach the individual goal of 5.9 points. Seven states managed to fulfill their goals: Amazonas, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Piauí, Ceará, Paraná and Goiás. The lowest results were for Amapá, with 4 points, and Pará, Rio Grande do Norte, Sergipe and Bahia, with 4.1 points.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Renan Antônio da Silva, State University of Ceará

    Doutor em Educação Escolar pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP). Docente Permanente no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE). Bolsista da FUNCAP.

  • Pedro Demo, University of Brasília

    Doutor em Sociologia pela Universität Des Saarlandes/Alemanha (1971). Professor titular aposentado da Universidade de Brasília, Departamento de Sociologia. Professor Emérito. Fez pós-doutorado na UCLA/Los Angeles (1999-2000). Tem experiência na área de Política Social, com ênfase em Sociologia da Educação e Pobreza Política. Trabalha com Metodologia Científica, no contexto da Teoria Crítica e Pesquisa Qualitativa. Pesquisa principalmente a questão da aprendizagem nas escolas públicas, por conta dos desafios da cidadania popular. Publicou mais de 100 livros. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-2781

  • Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, FIOCRUZ

    Doutora em Saúde Pública pela Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Pesquisadora 1A e Emérita do CNPQ. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-9301

References

ANUÁRIO BRASILEIRO DA EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA. Todos pela Educação. Moderna: São Paulo, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.todospelaeducacao.org.br/_uploads/_posts/302.pdf. Acesso em: 09 set. 2020.

BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR (BNCC). Educação é a Base. MEC: Brasília, 2018. Disponível em: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf. Acesso em: 09 set. 2020.

DEMO, P. Atividades de Aprendizagem – Sair da mania do ensino para comprometer-se com a aprendizagem do estudante. SED/Gov. MS, Campo Grande, 2018. Diponível em: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FKskDCxNB422PVhrjrDjD48S4cjsb77-/view. Acesso em: 09 set. 2020.

DEMO, P. Educação à Deriva – À direita e à esquerda: instrucionismo como patrimônio nacional, 2020. Disponível em: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10nMlgL8N9GKFgwtnbL-bIn7GQf0HdyA4/view. Acesso em: 09 set. 2020.

DINTERSMITH, T. What school could be: Insights and inspiration from teachers across America. Princeton U. Press: Princeton, 2018.

FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir - História da violência nas prisões. Vozes: Petrópolis, 1977.

SCHLEICHER, A. PISA 2018 – Insights and Interpretations. OECD. OECD Publishing: Paris, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf. Acesso em: 09 set. 2020.

ZHAO, Y. Who is afraid of the big bad dragon: Why China has the best (and the worst) education system in the world. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 2014.

ZHAO, Y. What works may hurt – Side effects in education. Teachers College: Press, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-19

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Renan Antônio da Silva, Pedro Demo, Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBILITY: I hereby certify that I partially or fully participated in the conception of the work, that I did not hide any links or financial agreements between the authors and companies that may be interested in this article publication. I certify that the text is original and that the work, partially or fully, or any other work with a substantially similar content written by me, was not sent to any other journal and it will not be send while my submission is being considered by Revista Educar Mais, whether in printed or electronic format.

The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the manuscript and, when sending the article to the journal, guarantees s/he has obtained the permission to do so, as well as s/he guarantees the article does not infringe upon anyone’s copyright nor violate any proprietary rights. The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed.

Revista Educar Mais is Open Access, does not charge any fees, whether for submission or article processing. The journal adopts Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI)’s definition, i.e., any users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search and link to the full texts of these articles.

All the articles are published under the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional license. The authors keep the copyright of their production. That way, they must be contacted directly if there is any interest in commercial use of their work.

How to Cite

IDEB-2019 results suggest progress in high school. (2021). Educar Mais, 5(5), 990-1002. https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.5.2021.2582