Discontinuance of instructional innovations in physics education: when positive results are not enough

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.10.2026.4395

Keywords:

Diffusion of Innovations Theory, case study, physics education

Abstract

The physics education literature shows that active learning strategies yield superior outcomes, yet sustained adoption remains limited. Discontinuance, whereby a teacher abandons an innovation despite favorable results, is scarcely investigated. This article analyzes this phenomenon in a case where conditions appeared favorable, drawing on Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory. Through a single, holistic case study, a high school physics teacher who implemented three innovations at a high-standard private school was investigated. All three were discontinued despite positive learning outcomes. The analysis reveals that discontinuance resulted not from the teacher’s negative assessment, but from converging pressures within the social system. Although material compatibility was high, incompatibilities in values, norms, and perceived needs proved decisive. The study concludes that favorable material conditions are necessary but insufficient, and suggests, based on the case, the possibility of expanding Rogers’ typology to encompass discontinuance imposed by the social system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ana Amélia Petter, Uiversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SUL - UFRGS

    Doutora em Ensino de Física (2025) pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Física (PPGEnFis) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFGRS), Mestra em Ensino de Física (2021) pelo mesmo programa (PPGEnFís) da UFRGS, formada em Licenciatura em Física (2018) na UFRGS.

  • Ives Solano Araujo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS

    Licenciatura e Bacharelado em Física (FURG - 2000), Mestrado em Física na área de concentração Ensino de Física (UFRGS - 2002) e Doutorado em Física também voltado ao Ensino de Física (UFRGS 2005). Professor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

  • Tobias Espinosa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS

    Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e docente permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Física (PPGEnFís/UFRGS). É licenciado em Física pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS, 2013), mestre (2016) e doutor (2019) em Ensino de Física pela UFRGS.

References

ARAUJO, Ives Solano; MAZUR, Eric. Instrução pelos Colegas e Ensino sob Medida: uma proposta para o engajamento dos alunos no processo de ensino-aprendizagem de Física. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, v. 30, n. 2, p. 362–384, 2013.

BERGMANN, Jonathan; SAMS, Aaron. Sala de Aula Invertida: uma metodologia ativa de aprendizagem. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 2018.

BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. 1. ed. London: SAGE, 2022.

DANCY, Melissa et al. Faculty online learning communities focused on evidence-based instructional practices. Physical Review Physics Education Research, v. 20, n.1, p. 010147, 2024.

DESLAURIERS, Louis et al. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 116, n. 39, p. 19251–19257, 2019.

DESLAURIERS, Louis; SCHELEW, Ellen; WIEMAN, Carl. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, v. 332, n. 6031, p. 862–864, 2011.

FREEMAN, Scott et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 111, n. 23, p. 8410–8415, 2014.

FULLAN, Michael. The new meaning of educational change. 4. ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2007.

HENDERSON, Charles; DANCY, Melissa H. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, v. 3, n. 2, p. 020102, 2007.

HENDERSON, Charles; DANCY, Melissa; NIEWIADOMSKA-BUGAJ, Magdalena. Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, v. 8, n. 2, p. 020104, 2012.

PETTER, Ana Amélia. Barreiras e facilitadores para a adoção de inovações didáticas no Ensino de Física. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2021.

PETTER, Ana Amélia. Um modelo teórico para viabilização de inovações didáticas. Tese (Doutorado em Ensino de Física) – Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2025.

PETTER, Ana Amélia; ARAUJO, Ives Solano; ESPINOSA, Tobias. Contexto institucional e adoção de inovações didáticas no ensino de Física: seis eixos para análise. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, no prelo.

ROGERS, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations. 5. ed. New York: Free Press, 2003.

STAINS, Marilyne et al. Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, v. 359, n. 6383, p. 1468–1470, 2018.

THEOBALD, Elli J. et al. Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 117, n. 12, p. 6476–6483, 2020.

YIN, Robert K. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6. ed. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne: SAGE, 2018.

YIN, Robert K. Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2016.

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Discontinuance of instructional innovations in physics education: when positive results are not enough. (2026). Educar Mais, 10. https://doi.org/10.15536/reducarmais.10.2026.4395